Finally published in the Financial Express. Or read it right here..
“You’re born alone and you die alone and this world just drops a bunch of rules on top of you to make you forget those facts. But I never forget. I’m living like there’s no tomorrow, because there isn’t one.”
-Don Draper, Mad Men (Smoke gets in your eyes)
Thus emerges a new family portrait—the in-laws relegated to the role of figurative heads, the husband happy to play the sidekick, evolved enough to give her space (and his credit card) and the kids know who is the boss, submitting to her verdict when it comes to their noisy needs. She is the new locus of control. Armed with this new found belief, the erstwhile self-sacrificing Sati-Savitri has now discovered that ‘she’s worth it’. But this is just the beginning. We’re not talking about an individualistic, feminist streak that our advertising often mimics. It’s a deep-rooted consciousness, a zeitgeist for the changing India story that will impact our economics as much as it will re-design our culture. And it all begins with a systematic deconstruction of the old archetype and followed by a journey of self-creation that, for once, puts the ‘I’ at the centre of her life.
For example, children still take up a lot of time and head space, but she is not pinned to this axis nor is she pinned to her role as a wife. She seeks an identity independent of these crutches. And often there is a conflict between the role she is expected to play and who she wants to be. Sure, her multi-dimensional act as a home-maker, care-taker, working professional, mother, wife and daughter-in-law has given her more latitude than ever before, but she doesn’t want to be a super-mom. Selfishness has seeped in. A line has been drawn.
That being said, I view selfishness as acting in one’s self-interest—a virtue that does not have to conflict with someone else’s interests. The selfish person will act rationally in a social set-up without sacrificing what’s ideal for them. And this gets most interesting when you look at what’s changing with young, urban women. Today, it’s culturally acceptable that women need enough room so that they can juggle life’s demands. However, a woman who’s maximising her own happiness is an entirely new breed. And yet, she feels responsible for her choices, not because she is obligated towards the expectations of the family. All her time is ‘me-time’. She is the centre of her universe. Welcome to the Woman 3.0—‘Sati Savitri’ was phased out by ‘SuperMom’ and now ‘SelfishMe’ is making ‘SuperMom’ look like a beta test. Of course, this leading edge of cultural change is most visible in elite, urban women and will slowly trickle down the socio-economic pyramid, and men will happily subscribe to this virtue.
“My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of a man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as a moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute,” said Ayn Rand in her novel Atlas Shrugged. Had she written this from the current Indian perspective, she would have chosen the gender more carefully. Of course, Rand’s protagonist is incorruptible and always lives up to this lofty ideal, this generation settles for more everyday selfishness. The disenchantment with a routine overlapped with trajectories of other lives much like Julia Roberts’ role in Eat, Pray, Love seems to resonate with young women. The search for self-identity is often in conflict with the traditional roles she is expected to play. Interestingly, the movie shows the helplessness of Tulsi her confidante in an ashram, who like Julia Roberts’ character is seeking a bigger meaning in life but is trapped being ‘born Indian’ and wants to ‘roam’ like her friend and ‘live in Hawaii’.
A lot of friction in marriages is blamed squarely on this phenomenon. Divorce rates are on the rise and Pratima Gupta, an eminent HC advocate and a mother of two, who addresses cases of divorce among others, says, “Divorce rates have gone up because women don’t want to ‘adjust’ in a marriage anymore. The problem is compounded because ‘I, me and myself’ is taking precedence over everything else. Compromise is a big word. If the grounds on which they want a divorce are trivial, I always ask them to reconsider.” She may not admit it but selfishness is good for her business, as much as it is for the Unilevers and P&Gs of the world.
Which brings us to shampoo. A woman’s face and her hair define her personality. Of all the personal care items that deal with these -hair oil is passé, face washes are important, but one can’t experiment with the face in a way one can experiment with hair. And only the shampoo has both intrinsic as well as extrinsic qualities that can help in defining who she is. Aarti’s choice of shampoo was not just about her evolved understanding of different hair types. It was her declaration of independence, and more importantly an act of self-definition. Think about it, shampoo is used at a time which is most private, it is used to bring out the most defining attribute of femininity. In the words of Shana Alexander: “Hair brings one’s self-image into focus; it is vanity’s proving ground. Hair is terribly personal, a tangle of mysterious prejudices”. She won’t let her mother-in-law invade the last sanctuary. This was her own space, her own time, and the beginnings of selfishness. And it all started with a shampoo.